The hard part was never any single tool, process, or hire. It's fitting all the pieces together into something that actually runs — while the pieces themselves keep changing underneath you.
That's the work I do. You bring the problems — the stack, the process, the parts that don't talk to each other — and I use AI to synthesize them into a system that works, built from what I've seen inside real RevOps and GTM operations, not a framework off a slide.
GTM and RevOps run on more tools and more data than any one team can track. That’s not a failure on your part — it’s just where the market is.
I take what’s scattered across your stack, your team, and your process, and turn it into one system that actually fits together.
AI does the heavy lifting — reading, structuring, connecting — so the solution ships in days, not quarters.
Six shapes the work usually takes. Every engagement starts from your actual stack and process, not a template.
AI-scored queues that tell reps who to call first, not just who’s next.
Working tools shipped in days, not quarters, built for the workflow you actually have.
Answers built into the tools reps already use, so the team stops being the bottleneck.
Deduplicated, standardized, and guarded so the mess doesn’t come back in six months.
Handoffs between teams that carry context automatically, instead of starting from zero.
The same synthesis engine behind this page: reading a market at scale and turning it into a clear signal.
The shapes this work usually takes: what the situation was, what I built, and what the fix actually involved. Pick one from the index.
Real engagement patterns, described generally — specifics vary by client
Reps were working leads in the order they arrived, not the order they’d actually convert — every lead treated as equally worth a call, and the best ones getting lost in the queue.
An AI-scored qualification layer that ranks incoming leads against the signals that actually predicted a close, then routes the top of the queue straight to reps inside the CRM they already use.
What this involvedA chronometer is not certified on how many parts it holds. It is certified on how far it drifts per day. We score businesses the same way.
Counts the disconnected platforms one role must hold together. A reading of complexity bought and not yet resolved.
Counts the distinct skill categories demanded of one person. A reading of design a company asks a single hire to carry.
Hands show the current market averages on a 0–100 scale
A definition of a qualified lead that survives contact with Sales.
A pipeline that reflects reality without a weekly negotiation.
A handoff that carries the promise made during the sale.
One forecast, one source, and no reconciliation ritual.
Usage evidence that reaches the roadmap before the churn does.
Four stages, no human in the loop — the same kind of AI-run pipeline I build for the operations I work on. It doesn't replace judgment, it removes the busywork standing between a question and an answer. Open a stage to read it.
A scheduled n8n workflow pulls RevOps postings daily from LinkedIn and other sources. The ingestion layer runs without supervision, so the record grows whether or not anyone is watching.
LinkedIn via Apify · Adzuna API · SerpAPI
I work inside Revenue Operations — the function that sits at the center of every handoff between Marketing, Sales, and Customer Success, and feels every gap between them first. That vantage point is where this page comes from.
RevStack started as a way to prove a point: that reading a market at scale doesn't require a team, it requires the right use of AI. Everything on this page — the scoring, the automation, the case work — runs on that same principle. It's the same one I bring to the businesses I work with.
Whatever's scattered across your stack, your team, or your process — send it over. I'll synthesize it with AI into a system that actually runs, the same way this page and the record behind it were built.